Énercycle

Method of published notices — where the number comes from

The calculation

Each notice from this contracting authority is counted once, under the method the source gives it: 113 notices in all.

What goes in

Every notice this contracting authority published is in the denominator; the method is classified for each one.

Breakdown

Notices published, by method

Method	Notices	Share
Public call for tenders	42	37.2%
By invitation	28	24.8%
By qualification	0	0.0%
Direct award	43	38.1%
Unclassified method	0	0.0%

The rows

See this contracting authority's notices →

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 17, 2026 · link to this detail

Something wrong in this block or calculation? Report an error in this block

By year — where the medians come from — where the number comes from

What goes in

Each median covers the declared amounts of the year's awards; awards without a declared amount count in the “Awards” column and stay out of the median.

Breakdown

By year — where the medians come from

Year	Median	Middle half	Declared
2019	$26,800	$17,500 – $51,637	3 of 3 declared
2020	$46,302	$40,259 – $56,807	4 of 4 declared
2021	$43,800	$32,850 – $55,320	25 of 25 declared
2022	$325,828	$49,130 – $2,841,272	37 of 37 declared
2023	$246,546	$24,612 – $1,225,207	13 of 13 declared

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 17, 2026 · the rule, in Sources and limits · link to this detail

Something wrong in this block or calculation? Report an error in this block

The five most frequent suppliers — where the number comes from

The calculation

23 awards to the five most frequent suppliers ÷ 82 awards = 28.0%

What goes in

82 winning awards on this contracting authority's notices, excluding cancelled or unsuccessful awards, shared among 49 distinct suppliers. An award shared by several suppliers counts once for each. Awards are counted, not amounts, and no supplier is named. Awards with no linked supplier, or whose supplier is hidden, stay out.

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 17, 2026 · the rule, in Sources and limits · link to this detail

Something wrong in this block or calculation? Report an error in this block

Time to decision — where the number comes from

The calculation

For each notice: the calendar days between its closing date and its first award date. The number shown is the median of these delays, rounded to the day: 9 days.

What goes in

43 notices go in: those with a closing date whose earliest dated winning award, neither cancelled nor unsuccessful, falls on or after the closing day. This contracting authority's other notices stay out. This count comes from the delay computation, made at another time than the count of published notices: the two do not subtract.

Breakdown

By award procedure

Procedure	Median wait	Quartiles	Notices
Public call for tenders	26 d	13 – 46 d	102,225
Unclassified method	29 d	14 – 51 d	13,078
By invitation	13 d	6 – 24 d	4,351
Selective	31 d	11 – 57 d	449

Distribution

0 days50 days

middle half: 2 days to 15 days (bar) · median: 9 days (dark line) · same rule, over all Quebec notices: 26 days (grey line)

Something wrong in this chart? Report an error in this chart

How to read it

Between the closing date of a public tender and its award, this contracting authority takes 9 days on median — half of its notices are awarded between 2 and 15 days (over 43 notices). Across all contracting authorities the median is 26 days (over 120,103 notices): 0.3 times. A longer wait describes a purchasing practice, not an irregularity. It is computed only on notices carrying both a closing date and an award date.

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 17, 2026 · link to this detail

Something wrong in this block or calculation? Report an error in this block