Centre de services scolaire Marie-Victorin

Method of published notices — where the number comes from

The calculation

Each notice from this contracting authority is counted once, under the method the source gives it: 921 notices in all.

What goes in

Every notice this contracting authority published is in the denominator; the method is classified for each one.

Breakdown

Notices published, by method

Method	Notices	Share
Public call for tenders	552	59.9%
By invitation	94	10.2%
By qualification	229	24.9%
Direct award	46	5.0%
Unclassified method	0	0.0%

The rows

See this contracting authority's notices →

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 4, 2026 · link to this detail

By year — where the medians come from — where the number comes from

What goes in

Each median covers the declared amounts of the year's awards; awards without a declared amount count in the “Awards” column and stay out of the median.

Breakdown

By year — where the medians come from

Year	Median	Middle half	Declared
2019	$814,048	$207,733 – $3,439,150	45 of 45 declared
2020	$269,375	$139,400 – $624,900	133 of 133 declared
2021	$250,426	$154,643 – $699,323	232 of 232 declared
2022	$320,000	$49,724 – $645,000	228 of 228 declared
2023	$98,009	$43,490 – $544,198	330 of 330 declared
2024	$96,402	$43,570 – $387,743	364 of 364 declared
2025	$152,379	$48,611 – $342,212	99 of 99 declared
2026	$90,900	$41,409 – $325,345	83 of 83 declared

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 4, 2026 · the rule, in Sources and limits · link to this detail

The five most frequent suppliers — where the number comes from

The calculation

236 awards to the five most frequent suppliers ÷ 1,528 awards = 15.4%

What goes in

1,528 winning awards on this contracting authority's notices, excluding cancelled or unsuccessful awards, shared among 405 distinct suppliers. An award shared by several suppliers counts once for each. Awards are counted, not amounts, and no supplier is named. Awards with no linked supplier, or whose supplier is hidden, stay out.

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 4, 2026 · the rule, in Sources and limits · link to this detail

Time to decision — where the number comes from

The calculation

For each notice: the calendar days between its closing date and its first award date. The number shown is the median of these delays, rounded to the day: 15 days.

What goes in

501 notices go in: those with a closing date whose earliest dated winning award, neither cancelled nor unsuccessful, falls on or after the closing day. This contracting authority's other notices stay out. This count comes from the delay computation, made at another time than the count of published notices: the two do not subtract.

Breakdown

By award procedure

Procedure	Median wait	Quartiles	Notices
Public call for tenders	26 d	13 – 46 d	101,698
Unclassified method	29 d	14 – 51 d	13,081
By invitation	13 d	6 – 24 d	4,317
Selective	30 d	11 – 57 d	443

Distribution

0 days50 days

middle half: 10 days to 23 days (bar) · median: 15 days (dark line) · same rule, over all Quebec notices: 26 days (grey line)

How to read it

Between the closing date of a public tender and its award, this contracting authority takes 15 days on median — half of its notices are awarded between 10 and 23 days (over 501 notices). Across all contracting authorities the median is 26 days (over 119,539 notices): 0.6 times. A longer wait describes a purchasing practice, not an irregularity. It is computed only on notices carrying both a closing date and an award date.

Source

SEAO — Quebec open data · CC-BY 4.0 · data up to date as of October 4, 2026 · link to this detail