sel gemme

Nature des besoins :

Commodity Management Request for Reviewer Endorsement
01. To direct this form to the appropriate Reviewer, consult the
Standing Offer Index, specifically the "Tables of Commodity
Teams, Regional Reviewers and Designated Commodities".

02. Provide a succinct description of what is being procured,
including geographical location(s) of coverage. To supply and
deliver sodium chloride (rock salt) with anti-caking compound,
bulk highway, on an "as and when requested" basis from date of
issue up to and including April 30, 2012 for various federal
departments and agencies in the province of Nova Scotia,
including Cape Breton Island.
l03. Requisition Number: E6HAL-120009 GSIN: N6810AY
04. Type of SO (NMSO, NISO, RMSO, RISO, DISO)/SA: RMSO

05. What is the estimated business volume per year? $575,,000
What is the estimated "extended period" business volume? n/a
06. What dollar value ($) will appear on the face of the SO/SA
document(s)? $575,000.00
07. Does the proposed request for the creation, renewal or
extension duplicate any other SO/SA/National Approach? If yes, a
full explanation should be attached to this request articulating
why the duplication is required with timelines to eliminate it.
The Reviewer should not normally endorse duplication requests.
No
08. Will the SOs/SAs be available for use to all federal
departments? If not, explain. Various departments as listed in
Annex B of RFSO
09. Will multiple SOs/SAs, for the same requirement(s) be issued
to multiple offerors/suppliers? If yes, explain how client
departments will competitively determine, at the point of each
call-up/contract, which offeror/supplier to select. Does PWGSC
have a mechanism in place to assist the client department in
their selection? If there is no such system, how will the client
department competitively select the offeror/supplier? Only
one SOA issued
10. If bid pricing is not part of the offeror/supplier
evaluation/selection process, explain what process/system will
be made available to the end user to facilitate competition. n/a
If this is a request for endorsement associated to an amendment
to an existing SO/SA, skip to question 20. If not, continue.
11. What is the procurement strategy (competitive/sole source)?
competitive - MERX 40 day posting
12. Will the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT), the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the World Trade
Organization Agreement on Government Procurement (WTO-AGP)
apply? If so, indicate which one(s) will apply?
AIT/NAFTA/WTO-AGP
13. Will the offerors/suppliers be providing usage reports? yes
If yes, does the pricing strategy include usage threshold
discounts? no
14. Were environmental performance considerations included in
the solicitation strategy and environment requirements
integrated in the solicitation strategy and decisions taken
documented in the procurement file? If not, explain. n/a
15. Were small and medium enterprise considerations included in
the solicitation strategy and decisions taken documented in the
procurement file? If not, explain. all firms may bid
16. Were Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements (CLCAs)
considerations and/or the set-aside under the Procurement
Strategy for Aboriginal Business (PSAB) included in the
solicitation strategy and decisions taken documented in the
procurement file? If not, explain. Not for delivery to CLCA
areas and no known Aboriginal firms can supply.
17. What is the total duration, including proposed extensions,
of the proposed SO/SA? Date of issue to April 30, 2012 Why was
this total duration period chosen? winter season Is PWGSC
resourcing associated to the planned duration? no Is it the
standard period for this commodity and type of SO/SA? yes If
not, explain. Any deviation will require the next higher level
of approval, the highest level being the ADM, Acquisitions
Branch.It is important to respect the established standard
period since it has been determined by taking into consideration
all relevant factors, including suppliers' access to government
procurement opportunities by tendering requirements at
reasonable intervals.
18. In the event of multiple year SOs/SAs, how will the prices
remain competitive during the entire period? anticipate
approximately six-month duration only - seasonal requirement
19. What are the SO call-up/SA contract limits and why were
these limits chosen? $40K call-up limit as per previous year's
SOA

Amendments to extend existing SO/SA

1. 20.
   Why is this SO/SA not being re-solicited?
2. 21.
   How will the prices remain competitive during the extension

period(s)?
22. What was the original SO/SA duration and what is the
proposed extension period?
23. How is the extension in the best interest of Canada?
Name of contracting officer:

This section must be completed by the Reviewer
A. Endorsed without comment. The Reviewer,
_________________________ (insert name of Reviewer), endorses
this request for issuance of a SO/SA or amendment for extension
____________ (insert requisition number), without comment. The
date of this endorsement is ________________ (insert date).
B. Endorsed with comments/recommendations/conditions. Outline
comments/recommendations/conditions or attach in a separate
document
C. Declined. Outline the rationale for the decision or attach
in a separate document
D. If any aspect of the original request or the file has been
modified as a result of Reviewer's comments or recommendations,
summarize the main aspects of the changes in the box to the
right.

Contracting officers must include this request in the
procurement file and the Reviewer comments must be included in
the CPAA or Procurement Plan submission. Once endorsed with or
without comments/recommendations/conditions or should the
request be declined, the Reviewer will e-mail it back to the
contracting officer with a copy to (courriel sur l'avis officiel).

Date de livraison : Indiquée ci-dessus

L'État se réserve le droit de négocier les conditions de tout
marché avec les fournisseurs.

Les documents peuvent être présentés dans l'une ou l'autre des
langues officielles du Canada.