National Research Council of Canada EN
Plan ministériel et comptes publics, exercice 2024-25. Noms et textes tels que la source les publie.
34 programmesécart médian +14,6 % (quartiles +0,2 % et +36,6 %)25 au-dessus du plan · 7 au-dessousETP : écart médian +0,4 %
Programme par programme
| Programme EN | Planifié | Réel | Écart | ETP prévus | ETP réels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Science Library | 16 M$ | 15,9 M$ | −0,8 % | 28,4 | 28,1 |
| Collaborative Science, Technology and Innovation Program | 48,6 M$ | 48,7 M$ | +0,2 % | 38,1 | 42 |
| TRIUMF | 61,2 M$ | 61,2 M$ | 0,0 % | 0 | 0 |
| Genomics Research and Development Initiative Shared Priority Projects | 0 $ | sans objet | sans objet | 0 | 0 |
Triés par écart absolu. Chaque ligne est un programme tel que publié ; aucune ligne n'additionne les programmes. Un planifié nul ou négatif rend l'écart «sans objet».
Dans les mots du ministère
« Actual spending was higher than planned due to an increase in revenue funding provided for the year, an increase in spending supporting Canada's Critical Minerals Strategy as well as an increase in capital spending. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart. Citée telle quelle, en anglais ; Lauréo ne commente pas.« Actual spending was higher than planned mainly due to the substantial cost of operating the Clinical Trial Material Facility (CTMF). In addition, the capital investment required to substantially complete the construction of the CTMF concluded in 2024-25. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Actual spending was lower than planned due to the reorganization and decentralization of business development positions. The planned value did not take into account this reorganization. The impact of the reorganization has been addressed as part of the 2025-26 Departmental Plan. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Spending was higher than planned mainly due to costs arising from a new collective bargaining agreements. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Spending was higher than planned mainly due to one-time costs, such as retroactive and lump sum payments. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Actual spending was higher than planned due to a substantial increase in revenue funding provided for the year. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Spending was lower than planned due to reduced spending on several major capital projects financed from NRC's facility renewal funding. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Actual spending was higher than planned due to a substantial increase in revenue funding provided for the year. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Spending was higher than planned primarily due to increased capital spending, supporting both minor capital acquisitions and a major capital project, financed by NRC's facility renewal funding. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.« Spending was less than planned due to in-year surpluses associated with the Construction Decarbonization initiative sourced from temporary funding. In addition, a major capital project supporting infrastructure for fire research was placed on hold and as such incurred fewer expenditures. »Plan ministériel 2024-25, explication de l'écart.Autorisé contre dépensé — crédits votés
| Crédit EN | Autorisé | Dépensé | Part utilisée |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crédit 1 · Operating/Program | 655 M$ | 653 M$ | 99,7 % |
| Crédit 5 · Capital | 169,7 M$ | 159,9 M$ | 94,2 % |
| Crédit 10 · Grants & Contributions | 641,4 M$ | 639,7 M$ | 99,7 % |
Comptes publics 2024-25, un crédit par ligne. 4 postes législatifs (S) sont comptés à part : leur autorisation égale la dépense par construction, et une part utilisée de 100 % n'y dirait rien. Autorisé et dépensé sont deux faits, jamais additionnés entre crédits.